Friday, December 5, 2008
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Amusing mini-conversation with a 6th grader who apparently had taken up an interest in politics three days ago
6th grader: Who did you vote for?
Me: Chuck Baldwin.
6th grader: No! I meant for president.
Apparently he thought I was referring to Baldwin's rousing victory over Alan Keyes for the Constitution Party's nomination. Smart kids these days.
Happy post-election, everyone!
Me: Chuck Baldwin.
6th grader: No! I meant for president.
Apparently he thought I was referring to Baldwin's rousing victory over Alan Keyes for the Constitution Party's nomination. Smart kids these days.
Happy post-election, everyone!
Thursday, September 18, 2008
The Sam
Hey guys, it's my first post! I've been playing some music again with Ed and Berg lately and it got me thinking of good times past. So tonight, being both incredibly bored and feeling a little nostalgic, I created an archive of everything I had that we recorded in the past. Somehow after 5 years of inactivity, the old sicsam page is still up, so I put it there for your listening pleasure. If any of you are interested in hearing what sounds like a cassette player in a trash can being beaten with a baseball bat, check it out at sicsam.tripod.com/TheArchive. Hope everything is going well for everyone and I'm sure I'll see you all some time in the future.
Kenton
Kenton
Monday, September 8, 2008
Updates on everyone?
Hey all,
Not having seen a lot of action on the blog in the late part of the summer, I thought I'd get things started for the schoolyear with a quick update on myself. If you could all comment back with 1) where you are, 2) what you're doing (school, job, etc.), 3) how you're doing (happy, sad, slovenly, etc.), and 4) whom you're supporting for the World Series this fall, I think we'd all feel a little more connected.
1) In case you didn't know, I've moved to Abilene, Texas, where Laura is finishing her senior year of college. People are much nicer down here, and the weather is much hotter.
2) I'm going to be substitute teaching while working as an accompanist at ACU.
3) I'm feeling good, but perhaps a little nostalgic for college. I'm in the process of applying to graduate school, so hopefully this will be remedied within the coming year.
4) If the Cardinals can't pull off an amazing comeback, I'm going to have to support Tampa Bay.
Not having seen a lot of action on the blog in the late part of the summer, I thought I'd get things started for the schoolyear with a quick update on myself. If you could all comment back with 1) where you are, 2) what you're doing (school, job, etc.), 3) how you're doing (happy, sad, slovenly, etc.), and 4) whom you're supporting for the World Series this fall, I think we'd all feel a little more connected.
1) In case you didn't know, I've moved to Abilene, Texas, where Laura is finishing her senior year of college. People are much nicer down here, and the weather is much hotter.
2) I'm going to be substitute teaching while working as an accompanist at ACU.
3) I'm feeling good, but perhaps a little nostalgic for college. I'm in the process of applying to graduate school, so hopefully this will be remedied within the coming year.
4) If the Cardinals can't pull off an amazing comeback, I'm going to have to support Tampa Bay.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
2008 Summer @ The Cinema
Iron Man
When I first heard that Jon Favreau would be directing this movie I wasn't sure if he could make it work. Boy, was I wrong! While I am a fan of Favreau, I didn't know if he could successfully direct a super hero movie. But from the moment I saw the trailer I knew that this would be a good one indeed. Robert Downey Jr's performance as Tony Stark/Iron Man is both excellent and hilarious. Within the first 30 seconds of the movie you realize he's going to be the "asshole that you gotta love." His sarcasm and wit keep you entertained throughout, and the flying and fighting sequences with Iron Man made me feel like a little kid again. Downey is backed up with great performances by Jeff Bridges and Terrence Howard. This would be the first of many super hero films released this summer, and this movie was a really fine start. If you are looking for an entertaining, hilarious, and intense movie then you should check out Iron Man.
Indiana Jones & The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull
It had been a long wait for Indy fans, and people were wondering if the final result would be worth the wait. But even after the movie was released there wasn't a definite answer. The reviews for this film were mixed, and even though I enjoyed the movie I must admit that it felt much different than the other Indiana Jones movies. The film delivers the classic over-the-top action sequences that the other films have, and Harrison Ford's portrayal of Indiana Jones fits perfectly with his previous performances. Several scenes felt out of place, but it was fun to have Shia LaBeouf and Cate Blanchett along for the ride. And it was great to bring Karen Allen back for another Indy movie. All in all this was a fun movie that gives you another chance to go on an adventure with Indiana Jones. And we all know that nostalgia is America's favorite pastime.
The Incredible Hulk
After the monstrosity that was HULK, Marvel decided to give this super hero franchise another shot. Would they have better luck the second time around? I wouldn't have allowed them to give it another go, beacuse I am not a fan of the Hulk. But its a good thing they did try again, because The Incredible Hulk was so much more "incredible" than its predecessor in every way. Edward Norton is the perfect Bruce Banner, and the CGI used for the new Hulk design is so much more detailed and believable. Liv Tyler's portrayal of Betty Ross was adequate, but she looked beautiful as she always does. The fight scenes with Hulk are very exciting, and the final battle with Abomination was so intense that I was gripping the arm rests on my seat. The final surprise at the end of the movie ties it in with Iron Man and helps build towards the Avengers movie that is on its way. If you like super hero movies, please check this one out.
Kung Fu Panda
I went into this movie with very low expectations, even though it features the voice of one of my favorite actors in Jack Black. And I was fairly pleased with what I received. Much of the dialogue in the film is very much JB influenced, and that was probably the best part of the movie. The story is pretty standard in that it focuses on Panda (Jack Black) having to overcome the odds and prove that he is the Dragon Warrior, despite nobody believing in him. Nothing too creative here. But children will love this movie, and adults won't mind it either. This movie brought about my favorite word of the summer with "Sca-doosh".
Wall-E
This was another movie I went to with low expectations. I guess I just have a grudge against CGI childrens movies. But I was pleasantly surprised with how adorable and loveable this movie and this character are. Wall-E is the last robot of his kind, and his mission is to clean up the filth left on earth by people who have gone to live in space. Wall-E falls in love with a robot from space named Eva, and it becomes their goal to show to the human race that earth is habitable again. The relationship between Wall-E and Eva is very cute, and Wall-E's human-like qualities are very humorous. It had the typical Disney movie feel to it, but it was a refreshing feeling. This is another film that is fun for children and adults alike. If you want to relax and enjoy a heartwarming story, please do yourself a favor and watch Wall-E.
Hancock
I was pretty sure I was going to like this movie from the moment I heard the concept behind it. I was told this movie was about a drunken bum who was also a super hero. 'Nuff said. The movie gave me exactly what I wanted, and Will Smith got me to like him again. It had been a while since I had seen a really good Will Smith movie, and his portrayal of a homeless asshole is hilarious. When the character of Hancock becomes more serious about his super hero role in society the film loses some of its charm. But you don't forget who Hancock was and who he is inside, so that helps to carry you through. The film also feature the gorgeous Charlize Theron and the funny Jason Bateman. The plot is somewhat questionable, but the focus of this film is on the character of Hancock. And he is going to be remembered for years to come. This is a fun spin on the super hero film genre, and I highly recommend it.
Hellboy 2: The Golden Army
If you weren't a fan of the first Hellboy, there is no reason to believe that you will like this sequel. But if you did enjoy the first Hellboy, then I believe you will find this movie to be even better. Ron Perlman returns as the bulky red hero Hellboy, and he's bringing a lot of great action sequences with him. There aren't many fun "creature" movies made anymore, but Hellboy delivers to people looking for that kind of entertainment. The movie focuses more on Hellboy's relationship with his girlfriend Liz (Selma Blair) and how he can possibly fit in with society. As stated before, the action sequences are amazing and the movie is one of the most visually stimulating films I have seen in a long time. Don't come to this film looking for a realistic portrayal of the world, because you will be outrageously dissappointed. But this is supposed to be a fun cinematic ride, and it is very entertaining indeed.
The Dark Knight
I had been looking forward to this movie for three long years, so needless to say my expectations were very high. And director Christopher Nolan blew me away with this film. All of my expectations were surpassed. Christian Bale reprises his role as Bruce Wayne/Batman alongside other Batman Begins actors Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, and Morgan Freeman. But the three new additions to this cast were the ones that stole the show. Maggie Gyllenhaal picks up the role of Rachel Dawes, and she outperforms Katie Holmes ten times over. Aaron Eckhart plays the role of Harvey Dent and does a spectacular job of making him lovable, despite his grim future. And the main star of this film is the late Heath Ledger. Ledger's portrayal of the Joker is immaculate. He is creepy, funny, lovable, and hateable all at the same time. Sorry Mr. Nicholson, you are no longer deserving of your reputation as the best Joker. Heath Ledger is the man now, and it is such a shame that we will not get to see him perform anymore. The Dark Knight is THE movie to see this summer. This is not only the best super hero movie I have ever seen, it is one of the best movies I have ever seen period. GO SEE IT!
When I first heard that Jon Favreau would be directing this movie I wasn't sure if he could make it work. Boy, was I wrong! While I am a fan of Favreau, I didn't know if he could successfully direct a super hero movie. But from the moment I saw the trailer I knew that this would be a good one indeed. Robert Downey Jr's performance as Tony Stark/Iron Man is both excellent and hilarious. Within the first 30 seconds of the movie you realize he's going to be the "asshole that you gotta love." His sarcasm and wit keep you entertained throughout, and the flying and fighting sequences with Iron Man made me feel like a little kid again. Downey is backed up with great performances by Jeff Bridges and Terrence Howard. This would be the first of many super hero films released this summer, and this movie was a really fine start. If you are looking for an entertaining, hilarious, and intense movie then you should check out Iron Man.
Indiana Jones & The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull
It had been a long wait for Indy fans, and people were wondering if the final result would be worth the wait. But even after the movie was released there wasn't a definite answer. The reviews for this film were mixed, and even though I enjoyed the movie I must admit that it felt much different than the other Indiana Jones movies. The film delivers the classic over-the-top action sequences that the other films have, and Harrison Ford's portrayal of Indiana Jones fits perfectly with his previous performances. Several scenes felt out of place, but it was fun to have Shia LaBeouf and Cate Blanchett along for the ride. And it was great to bring Karen Allen back for another Indy movie. All in all this was a fun movie that gives you another chance to go on an adventure with Indiana Jones. And we all know that nostalgia is America's favorite pastime.
The Incredible Hulk
After the monstrosity that was HULK, Marvel decided to give this super hero franchise another shot. Would they have better luck the second time around? I wouldn't have allowed them to give it another go, beacuse I am not a fan of the Hulk. But its a good thing they did try again, because The Incredible Hulk was so much more "incredible" than its predecessor in every way. Edward Norton is the perfect Bruce Banner, and the CGI used for the new Hulk design is so much more detailed and believable. Liv Tyler's portrayal of Betty Ross was adequate, but she looked beautiful as she always does. The fight scenes with Hulk are very exciting, and the final battle with Abomination was so intense that I was gripping the arm rests on my seat. The final surprise at the end of the movie ties it in with Iron Man and helps build towards the Avengers movie that is on its way. If you like super hero movies, please check this one out.
Kung Fu Panda
I went into this movie with very low expectations, even though it features the voice of one of my favorite actors in Jack Black. And I was fairly pleased with what I received. Much of the dialogue in the film is very much JB influenced, and that was probably the best part of the movie. The story is pretty standard in that it focuses on Panda (Jack Black) having to overcome the odds and prove that he is the Dragon Warrior, despite nobody believing in him. Nothing too creative here. But children will love this movie, and adults won't mind it either. This movie brought about my favorite word of the summer with "Sca-doosh".
Wall-E
This was another movie I went to with low expectations. I guess I just have a grudge against CGI childrens movies. But I was pleasantly surprised with how adorable and loveable this movie and this character are. Wall-E is the last robot of his kind, and his mission is to clean up the filth left on earth by people who have gone to live in space. Wall-E falls in love with a robot from space named Eva, and it becomes their goal to show to the human race that earth is habitable again. The relationship between Wall-E and Eva is very cute, and Wall-E's human-like qualities are very humorous. It had the typical Disney movie feel to it, but it was a refreshing feeling. This is another film that is fun for children and adults alike. If you want to relax and enjoy a heartwarming story, please do yourself a favor and watch Wall-E.
Hancock
I was pretty sure I was going to like this movie from the moment I heard the concept behind it. I was told this movie was about a drunken bum who was also a super hero. 'Nuff said. The movie gave me exactly what I wanted, and Will Smith got me to like him again. It had been a while since I had seen a really good Will Smith movie, and his portrayal of a homeless asshole is hilarious. When the character of Hancock becomes more serious about his super hero role in society the film loses some of its charm. But you don't forget who Hancock was and who he is inside, so that helps to carry you through. The film also feature the gorgeous Charlize Theron and the funny Jason Bateman. The plot is somewhat questionable, but the focus of this film is on the character of Hancock. And he is going to be remembered for years to come. This is a fun spin on the super hero film genre, and I highly recommend it.
Hellboy 2: The Golden Army
If you weren't a fan of the first Hellboy, there is no reason to believe that you will like this sequel. But if you did enjoy the first Hellboy, then I believe you will find this movie to be even better. Ron Perlman returns as the bulky red hero Hellboy, and he's bringing a lot of great action sequences with him. There aren't many fun "creature" movies made anymore, but Hellboy delivers to people looking for that kind of entertainment. The movie focuses more on Hellboy's relationship with his girlfriend Liz (Selma Blair) and how he can possibly fit in with society. As stated before, the action sequences are amazing and the movie is one of the most visually stimulating films I have seen in a long time. Don't come to this film looking for a realistic portrayal of the world, because you will be outrageously dissappointed. But this is supposed to be a fun cinematic ride, and it is very entertaining indeed.
The Dark Knight
I had been looking forward to this movie for three long years, so needless to say my expectations were very high. And director Christopher Nolan blew me away with this film. All of my expectations were surpassed. Christian Bale reprises his role as Bruce Wayne/Batman alongside other Batman Begins actors Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, and Morgan Freeman. But the three new additions to this cast were the ones that stole the show. Maggie Gyllenhaal picks up the role of Rachel Dawes, and she outperforms Katie Holmes ten times over. Aaron Eckhart plays the role of Harvey Dent and does a spectacular job of making him lovable, despite his grim future. And the main star of this film is the late Heath Ledger. Ledger's portrayal of the Joker is immaculate. He is creepy, funny, lovable, and hateable all at the same time. Sorry Mr. Nicholson, you are no longer deserving of your reputation as the best Joker. Heath Ledger is the man now, and it is such a shame that we will not get to see him perform anymore. The Dark Knight is THE movie to see this summer. This is not only the best super hero movie I have ever seen, it is one of the best movies I have ever seen period. GO SEE IT!
Monday, July 7, 2008
Cool Comics
Hey all,
I don't remember if you remember the Nietzsche Family Circus (link on the previous blog), but I think this is on par with it - mediocre comics turned into a commentary on the existential angst of postmodern society. It's called Garfield minus Garfield, and you can find it here. Basically, they're just Garfield comic strips from which every character has been removed except Jon, Garfield's loser-owner. I thought some were pretty brilliant, some of which are shown above. I hope everyone's having a good summer.
Friday, July 4, 2008
Eureka!
It is said that Archimedes experienced a revelation in the bathtub. This morning, I experienced one in the shower. Although Archimedes was so excited about his revelation that he jumped out of the tub and ran through the streets naked, I decided to blog about mine. Here it is:
Over Christmas break, we will have Papermania 2008.
Yes, it's been too long since paper met table. I long to again hold that wide-ruled triangle of destiny between my fingers. The characters, the trademark moves, the frustrations, the rivalries, and the coveted trophy. It is time to revive the greatest game to come out of the PHS band room, time to revive the past...time to relive the glory.
Here are my proposals:
1. I propose that we host the tournament at the Pike County Farm Bureau auditorium (alternatives would be Crossroads Center, Methodist Church perhaps). It would be hassle-free and perhaps money-free. We could all chip in a few bucks for food and refreshments too.
2. It should be a double-elimination tournament so that you can have the chance to battle back and win the championship.
3. We need as many of the original players as possible and invite new players as well- I think we should get as many people as possible.
4. In order to finish the tournament in one day, we should end each game at first player to reach 20 points or 30 minutes- whichever comes first.
5. We should arrange at least one practice day for players to come down to the tables and practice so we all don't show up to the tournament cold.
How does everyone feel about these proposals? Please share your thoughts as well as any memories you have about paper football. To be honest, I have forgotten most of our character names (even my own :( ) and many of the moves. I think that Kyle "The Champion" Frere still holds the title, but I'm not positive. Where is the trophy currently? Someone in Pittsfield needs to hit up Adam Johnson, because I think he has the last tournament bracket, and he can help set up the new one. I'm going to make a facebook group for this- feel free to invite others.
Needless to say, I'm very excited about this, and I think we can make this a big event. Let's hear your thoughts.
Roderick, out
Over Christmas break, we will have Papermania 2008.
Yes, it's been too long since paper met table. I long to again hold that wide-ruled triangle of destiny between my fingers. The characters, the trademark moves, the frustrations, the rivalries, and the coveted trophy. It is time to revive the greatest game to come out of the PHS band room, time to revive the past...time to relive the glory.
Here are my proposals:
1. I propose that we host the tournament at the Pike County Farm Bureau auditorium (alternatives would be Crossroads Center, Methodist Church perhaps). It would be hassle-free and perhaps money-free. We could all chip in a few bucks for food and refreshments too.
2. It should be a double-elimination tournament so that you can have the chance to battle back and win the championship.
3. We need as many of the original players as possible and invite new players as well- I think we should get as many people as possible.
4. In order to finish the tournament in one day, we should end each game at first player to reach 20 points or 30 minutes- whichever comes first.
5. We should arrange at least one practice day for players to come down to the tables and practice so we all don't show up to the tournament cold.
How does everyone feel about these proposals? Please share your thoughts as well as any memories you have about paper football. To be honest, I have forgotten most of our character names (even my own :( ) and many of the moves. I think that Kyle "The Champion" Frere still holds the title, but I'm not positive. Where is the trophy currently? Someone in Pittsfield needs to hit up Adam Johnson, because I think he has the last tournament bracket, and he can help set up the new one. I'm going to make a facebook group for this- feel free to invite others.
Needless to say, I'm very excited about this, and I think we can make this a big event. Let's hear your thoughts.
Roderick, out
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
White Sox Philosophy
I have come to realize that only a select few have the desire to contribute and discuss the topics on the Friend Group blog. With that in mind, this next post is specifically for Berg, Myers, Braxton, Evan (a Cubs fan), and myself. (But if anyone else wants to discuss the topic, feel free to comment.)
I realize that I have only been a baseball fan and a White Sox fan for a short time. And I also understand that since my interest in the team and the sport started in late summer/early fall 2005, I will often be classified as a "bandwagon" fan. But I assure you, my love and passion for the White Sox and for baseball is very real. In fact, I believe that my passion for baseball replaced my passion for professional wrestling. I only mention this because I feel it is important to clarify that I have done my homework on the Sox and all that encompasses being a Sox fan. To me, there is a very deep and personal connection to the team that is special. Several of you on here are also Sox fans, and after our team just received a beatdown and a sweep by the Chicago Cubs, I felt it necessary to bring up several important questions or issues related to the crosstown rivalry between the White Sox and the Cubs...
Why are the Cubs seen as the premiere Chicago baseball team, and why are the White Sox considered the Second City's second team? I hate idiotic Cubs fans who cheer for their team and don't even know 3/4 of the players on the team. But I can respect Cubs fans that know their team and have been fans despite the 100 year world championship drought. If you are a REAL Cubs fan then I tip my cap to you for your patience and passion. But unfortunately I have not met very many REAL Cubs fans. As my good friend Bradley Bergstrand once told me, Cubs fans tend to be drunken frat boys with polo shirts that scream "Yay! Go Cubs Go!" So far this description has been very accurate in my experiences.
I will now try to put things into perspective for you from the view of a White Sox fan. Wrigley Field, the home of the Cubs, is in the wealthier North side of Chicago. The rich and wealthy are usually not seen as "heroes". U.S. Cellular Field (or New Comiskey), is in the South side of Chicago. This is where the working and lower class of the city lives. The common man is usually seen as an underdog or hero. Yet the White Sox are usually cast as the villains. Aside from lacking the same kind of popularity that the Cubs have, the Sox are also the villain baseball team in films such as Angels In The Outfield and Major League 2. And what about the differences in the kind of success each team has had? The Chicago Cubs have two world championships, while the Chicago White Sox have three.
I know that I am VERY biased, but I have just never been able to see what is so loveable about the Cubs. I understand that as of 2008 it has been 100 years since they last won a World Series, and this should evoke some sympathy. But when the White Sox won the World Series in 2005 it had been 88 years since they had last won a world championship. That is an equally long period to wait. Being a Sox fan, I understand the reasoning behind why we hate the Cubs. But what do Cubs fans have against the White Sox? The Cubs are loved and the Sox are neglected. That is why losing to the Cubs is so painful for Sox fans. It is like David losing to Goliath.
I have developed this personification where Chicago is the parent of two children: the Cubs and the White Sox. The Cubs are the noisy, abnoxious partygoer that the whole school knows and thinks is really cool. The White Sox are the nerdy, quiet outcast that studies and does well on tests, but is always overlooked. And the parent (Chicago) clearly likes the Cubs more. To me this is sad. The White Sox are the neglected underdogs. I am not attempting to change the minds of any Cubs fans out there. I am simply stating my beliefs and observations. I want to know what fuels a Cubs fan in their rivalry against the White Sox, because I just don't see any glory from the Cubs side of things.
I realize that I have only been a baseball fan and a White Sox fan for a short time. And I also understand that since my interest in the team and the sport started in late summer/early fall 2005, I will often be classified as a "bandwagon" fan. But I assure you, my love and passion for the White Sox and for baseball is very real. In fact, I believe that my passion for baseball replaced my passion for professional wrestling. I only mention this because I feel it is important to clarify that I have done my homework on the Sox and all that encompasses being a Sox fan. To me, there is a very deep and personal connection to the team that is special. Several of you on here are also Sox fans, and after our team just received a beatdown and a sweep by the Chicago Cubs, I felt it necessary to bring up several important questions or issues related to the crosstown rivalry between the White Sox and the Cubs...
Why are the Cubs seen as the premiere Chicago baseball team, and why are the White Sox considered the Second City's second team? I hate idiotic Cubs fans who cheer for their team and don't even know 3/4 of the players on the team. But I can respect Cubs fans that know their team and have been fans despite the 100 year world championship drought. If you are a REAL Cubs fan then I tip my cap to you for your patience and passion. But unfortunately I have not met very many REAL Cubs fans. As my good friend Bradley Bergstrand once told me, Cubs fans tend to be drunken frat boys with polo shirts that scream "Yay! Go Cubs Go!" So far this description has been very accurate in my experiences.
I will now try to put things into perspective for you from the view of a White Sox fan. Wrigley Field, the home of the Cubs, is in the wealthier North side of Chicago. The rich and wealthy are usually not seen as "heroes". U.S. Cellular Field (or New Comiskey), is in the South side of Chicago. This is where the working and lower class of the city lives. The common man is usually seen as an underdog or hero. Yet the White Sox are usually cast as the villains. Aside from lacking the same kind of popularity that the Cubs have, the Sox are also the villain baseball team in films such as Angels In The Outfield and Major League 2. And what about the differences in the kind of success each team has had? The Chicago Cubs have two world championships, while the Chicago White Sox have three.
I know that I am VERY biased, but I have just never been able to see what is so loveable about the Cubs. I understand that as of 2008 it has been 100 years since they last won a World Series, and this should evoke some sympathy. But when the White Sox won the World Series in 2005 it had been 88 years since they had last won a world championship. That is an equally long period to wait. Being a Sox fan, I understand the reasoning behind why we hate the Cubs. But what do Cubs fans have against the White Sox? The Cubs are loved and the Sox are neglected. That is why losing to the Cubs is so painful for Sox fans. It is like David losing to Goliath.
I have developed this personification where Chicago is the parent of two children: the Cubs and the White Sox. The Cubs are the noisy, abnoxious partygoer that the whole school knows and thinks is really cool. The White Sox are the nerdy, quiet outcast that studies and does well on tests, but is always overlooked. And the parent (Chicago) clearly likes the Cubs more. To me this is sad. The White Sox are the neglected underdogs. I am not attempting to change the minds of any Cubs fans out there. I am simply stating my beliefs and observations. I want to know what fuels a Cubs fan in their rivalry against the White Sox, because I just don't see any glory from the Cubs side of things.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Do I Dare?
Greetings Friends.
I am currently alone in the office, and it is 12:12 at night. As you might know, England is my home for the next month and a half, and I am already in over my head. I'm working with a public policy research group based at the UK Defence Academy (I know, defense is spelled wrong over here), and I'm pretty much learning an entire new field as I work. However, when I can sneak a look, it's fun to read the blog between long articles on energy security. I figured I should contribute something and at the same time put some thoughts I've been thinking down on paper. This is just the first part of my manifesto, and I hope that you can find the time to sift it through your brain after reading each installment. Following the illustrious repotoire of thought-provoking essays on the last blog (aliens, dating, Bergstrand's true sexuality), consider this the first of many deep discussions on the new blog...
What is science? It can be reasonably asserted that science is the study of the physical universe using systematic observation and experiment. It is how we humans use our sense, reason, and intellect to understand the world in which we live. By methodical study, observation, and experimentation, Albert Einstein discovered a relationship between mass and energy. Future scientists would confirm this relationship by repeating his experiments, and e=mc^2 became a law. Later, this law became integral to theories about black holes, warp speed, and other universal phenomenon. Here is a general explanation I found concerning the difference between a scientific law and a scientific theory:
Laws are generalizations about what has happened, from which we can generalize about what we expect to happen. They pertain to observational data. The ability of the ancients to predict eclipses had nothing to do with whether they knew just how they happened; they had a law but not a theory.
Theories are explanations of observations (or of laws). The fact that we have a pretty good understanding of how stars explode doesn't necessarily mean we could predict the next supernova; we have a theory but not a law.
For a theory to exist, the observations (laws) must be correct.
Next question: What is religion? Religion is a set of beliefs and/or practices relating to the divine. Religion cannot be proven through scientific means, because it relies primarily on the faith of the individual. For instance, although Jews believe that Moses spoke to God in person, they cannot support it with evidence because no Jew besides Moses had direct evidence of the encounter. Some religious followers (such as Deists, who simply believe that there is a God who directs a sort of cosmic, eternal symphony of solos) don't have to exercise much faith, while others (such as Scientologists, who believe that human stress is caused by wandering alien ghosts doomed to wander the Earth after being executed by a galactic tyrant) follow a plethora of assumptions.
Faith is essentially an assumption (although the religious are quick to assert that that assumption is strengthened by personal experience). Science and religion are separated by these assumptions. Once a theory relies primarily upon evidence that cannot be proven, and must be accepted through faith, it loses credence as a theory. Theories that rely upon assumptions are, in essence, religions.
So, my question to the Friend Group is this: "When does belief in a scientific theory become a religion?"
I already have my answer crafted, and it will come in Part II of my manifesto, to be written at a later date. Also, if you know where I am going with all of this, please don't discuss it in the comments; just answer debate the question positted above. Your assumption will most likely be proven correct with part duece and the bigger debate will begin.
With all that said, goodnight, and take care.
Roderick, out.
I am currently alone in the office, and it is 12:12 at night. As you might know, England is my home for the next month and a half, and I am already in over my head. I'm working with a public policy research group based at the UK Defence Academy (I know, defense is spelled wrong over here), and I'm pretty much learning an entire new field as I work. However, when I can sneak a look, it's fun to read the blog between long articles on energy security. I figured I should contribute something and at the same time put some thoughts I've been thinking down on paper. This is just the first part of my manifesto, and I hope that you can find the time to sift it through your brain after reading each installment. Following the illustrious repotoire of thought-provoking essays on the last blog (aliens, dating, Bergstrand's true sexuality), consider this the first of many deep discussions on the new blog...
What is science? It can be reasonably asserted that science is the study of the physical universe using systematic observation and experiment. It is how we humans use our sense, reason, and intellect to understand the world in which we live. By methodical study, observation, and experimentation, Albert Einstein discovered a relationship between mass and energy. Future scientists would confirm this relationship by repeating his experiments, and e=mc^2 became a law. Later, this law became integral to theories about black holes, warp speed, and other universal phenomenon. Here is a general explanation I found concerning the difference between a scientific law and a scientific theory:
Laws are generalizations about what has happened, from which we can generalize about what we expect to happen. They pertain to observational data. The ability of the ancients to predict eclipses had nothing to do with whether they knew just how they happened; they had a law but not a theory.
Theories are explanations of observations (or of laws). The fact that we have a pretty good understanding of how stars explode doesn't necessarily mean we could predict the next supernova; we have a theory but not a law.
For a theory to exist, the observations (laws) must be correct.
Next question: What is religion? Religion is a set of beliefs and/or practices relating to the divine. Religion cannot be proven through scientific means, because it relies primarily on the faith of the individual. For instance, although Jews believe that Moses spoke to God in person, they cannot support it with evidence because no Jew besides Moses had direct evidence of the encounter. Some religious followers (such as Deists, who simply believe that there is a God who directs a sort of cosmic, eternal symphony of solos) don't have to exercise much faith, while others (such as Scientologists, who believe that human stress is caused by wandering alien ghosts doomed to wander the Earth after being executed by a galactic tyrant) follow a plethora of assumptions.
Faith is essentially an assumption (although the religious are quick to assert that that assumption is strengthened by personal experience). Science and religion are separated by these assumptions. Once a theory relies primarily upon evidence that cannot be proven, and must be accepted through faith, it loses credence as a theory. Theories that rely upon assumptions are, in essence, religions.
So, my question to the Friend Group is this: "When does belief in a scientific theory become a religion?"
I already have my answer crafted, and it will come in Part II of my manifesto, to be written at a later date. Also, if you know where I am going with all of this, please don't discuss it in the comments; just answer debate the question positted above. Your assumption will most likely be proven correct with part duece and the bigger debate will begin.
With all that said, goodnight, and take care.
Roderick, out.
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Henry Jones Jr.!
What's happenin? Thought I'd pitch in with a fun topic; I think that everyone that contributes to this blog has seen the Indiana Jones films once or twice, and if you haven't, shame shame.
I've been thinking about this one since I saw the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull: What is Indiana Jones' most badass moment on film? After seeing the newest one again recently, I think I've made a decision, although I'll admit that he's had several moments that Han Solo only wishes he can....err, nevermind.
In the latest installment of the franchise, Mutt and Indy go to Peru lookin' for a friend, oh, a crystal skull too. They're attacked by these wild human monkey warriors and things aren't lookin good for Mutt when he notices that he's about to be shot with a poison dart. And then, whap! Indiana, who's in his 60's at this point mind you, quickly jumps up and shoots the dart into the monkey warrior's mouth through the opposite end. After seeing that the 2nd time, I think I can say that's Indy's most badass moment. Sure, he's outran huge bolder's and defeated the Nazi's, but I can't think of one other instance where one of Indy's foes was owned that bad.
What are some of your thoughts and your Indy Badass Moments?
I've been thinking about this one since I saw the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull: What is Indiana Jones' most badass moment on film? After seeing the newest one again recently, I think I've made a decision, although I'll admit that he's had several moments that Han Solo only wishes he can....err, nevermind.
In the latest installment of the franchise, Mutt and Indy go to Peru lookin' for a friend, oh, a crystal skull too. They're attacked by these wild human monkey warriors and things aren't lookin good for Mutt when he notices that he's about to be shot with a poison dart. And then, whap! Indiana, who's in his 60's at this point mind you, quickly jumps up and shoots the dart into the monkey warrior's mouth through the opposite end. After seeing that the 2nd time, I think I can say that's Indy's most badass moment. Sure, he's outran huge bolder's and defeated the Nazi's, but I can't think of one other instance where one of Indy's foes was owned that bad.
What are some of your thoughts and your Indy Badass Moments?
Friday, May 30, 2008
What makes a man, Mr. Lebowski?
Dude...
But seriously, it's time to roll with another topic. The old saying goes that, "The clothes make the man." Is this true? Because after watching a film on teen marketing in my Media Critical Theory class, I seem to think that music actually makes the man. Why does music, rather than film or various other forms of entertainment and culture, bring with it an entire dress code? Why is music so tightly knit with cultural dressing styles? People who listen to Hip Hop often wear baggy clothing and flat billed ball caps. People who listen to Indy music often wear clothing purchased from Goodwill or the Salvation Army. With Emo music comes thick black framed glasses and tight jeans. Metal and other Hard Rock brings about black clothing with metal spikes and chains. Why?
I am not asking this question because I think that this relationship is silly or because I actually expect us to come up with a perfect answer. I am simply putting forth this idea so it can be discussed and debated. Why do music and fashion often go hand in hand? It obviously has something to do with identifying oneself, but dig a bit deeper. Why music? I love pizza but I don't wear shoes made of pepperoni. I love comics and superheroes but I don't wear a cape (Though I really wish that I did). What is it about music that inspires people to dress a certain way?
But seriously, it's time to roll with another topic. The old saying goes that, "The clothes make the man." Is this true? Because after watching a film on teen marketing in my Media Critical Theory class, I seem to think that music actually makes the man. Why does music, rather than film or various other forms of entertainment and culture, bring with it an entire dress code? Why is music so tightly knit with cultural dressing styles? People who listen to Hip Hop often wear baggy clothing and flat billed ball caps. People who listen to Indy music often wear clothing purchased from Goodwill or the Salvation Army. With Emo music comes thick black framed glasses and tight jeans. Metal and other Hard Rock brings about black clothing with metal spikes and chains. Why?
I am not asking this question because I think that this relationship is silly or because I actually expect us to come up with a perfect answer. I am simply putting forth this idea so it can be discussed and debated. Why do music and fashion often go hand in hand? It obviously has something to do with identifying oneself, but dig a bit deeper. Why music? I love pizza but I don't wear shoes made of pepperoni. I love comics and superheroes but I don't wear a cape (Though I really wish that I did). What is it about music that inspires people to dress a certain way?
Friday, May 23, 2008
Reusing & Recycling
I just had a great week with Derrick, Shawn, and Berg in Chicago, but sadly they are all gone now. Derrick mentioned that I should link to where I've been writing columns for my school newspaper for the past couple of months, so here it is: www.dailynorthwestern.com - you can go to the 'archives' tab on the left and click on any Wednesday since the beginning of April, and then go to the Forum page within that. In addition, to save you and me time and energy, I am just going to post an entire column I wrote here about what I think of Obama's trade policy:
Profiles in Political Expediency
Many American progressives, stumped by the similarity between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, have suggested a tiebreaker: Hero-worship of dead presidents. Just as Republican candidates deify Ronald Reagan, Ted Kennedy, Caroline Kennedy, and other auspiciously-surnamed individuals have endorsed Obama because he reminds them of that zenith of Democratic presidents. (I'll give you a hint: It's not Jimmy Carter.)
The assertion that the best candidate will remind us of Reagan or John F. Kennedy is seriously flawed. Kennedy's legacy was cemented when he was shot. But if we believe that what happened during a presidency is more important than the manner of its end, we can more effectively evaluate Kennedy's term in office. While his minor failings (like installing a Baathist regime in a little country called Iraq) are well-known, Kennedy-ites shrug these off, saying that Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis easily excuses his blunders. But was the Crisis really Kennedy's finest hour, or did he take the world to the brink of nuclear war?
Kennedy, a brilliant Harvard grad, author and senator (remind you of anyone?), was the ultimate Cold Warrior, continually criticizing President Eisenhower for the "missile gap" caused by supposed legions of Soviet missiles hidden throughout Siberia. While campaigning in July 1960, Kennedy was briefed by CIA director Allen Dulles on the realities of the situation: it was estimated that the US actually had more missiles than the Soviets. By 1961, satellite imagery fully disproved the "missile gap."
But rather than make a profile in courage, Kennedy still stuck to his Cold Warrior rhetoric once he had won the White House. He stayed true to his virulently anti-Soviet image by installing ballistic Jupiter missiles in Turkey within range of Moscow. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev responded reasonably by installing similar missiles in Cuba. Kennedy was only able to avoid armed conflict by removing the Jupiter missiles that had catalyzed the situation. But the escalation leading to the Crisis should be blamed on Kennedy's hubris, not Soviet aggression.
The comparison to Kennedy only rang true once Obama's campaign reached Ohio, where he stepped away from his usual vague policy assertions to attack the North American Free Trade Agreement. Despite Obama's obvious intellect, he decided to defy centuries of economic thought going back to David Ricardo, who showed that free trade brings long-term benefits to all participants. If American manufacturing jobs leave, it is only because we ought to be producing something better. Repealing NAFTA would hurt everyone - most notably by drastically increasing gas prices as tariffs increase on oil imports from Canada.
Obama has shown that, like Kennedy, he can inspire with lofty words and ideals. Also like Kennedy, he can steadfastly stick to popular platforms even when they are wrong. He has not, however, proved why on earth these are good reasons to vote for him. Kennedy inspired his way into an ideologically flawed presidency, and Obama is following in his footsteps yet again.
Profiles in Political Expediency
Many American progressives, stumped by the similarity between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, have suggested a tiebreaker: Hero-worship of dead presidents. Just as Republican candidates deify Ronald Reagan, Ted Kennedy, Caroline Kennedy, and other auspiciously-surnamed individuals have endorsed Obama because he reminds them of that zenith of Democratic presidents. (I'll give you a hint: It's not Jimmy Carter.)
The assertion that the best candidate will remind us of Reagan or John F. Kennedy is seriously flawed. Kennedy's legacy was cemented when he was shot. But if we believe that what happened during a presidency is more important than the manner of its end, we can more effectively evaluate Kennedy's term in office. While his minor failings (like installing a Baathist regime in a little country called Iraq) are well-known, Kennedy-ites shrug these off, saying that Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis easily excuses his blunders. But was the Crisis really Kennedy's finest hour, or did he take the world to the brink of nuclear war?
Kennedy, a brilliant Harvard grad, author and senator (remind you of anyone?), was the ultimate Cold Warrior, continually criticizing President Eisenhower for the "missile gap" caused by supposed legions of Soviet missiles hidden throughout Siberia. While campaigning in July 1960, Kennedy was briefed by CIA director Allen Dulles on the realities of the situation: it was estimated that the US actually had more missiles than the Soviets. By 1961, satellite imagery fully disproved the "missile gap."
But rather than make a profile in courage, Kennedy still stuck to his Cold Warrior rhetoric once he had won the White House. He stayed true to his virulently anti-Soviet image by installing ballistic Jupiter missiles in Turkey within range of Moscow. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev responded reasonably by installing similar missiles in Cuba. Kennedy was only able to avoid armed conflict by removing the Jupiter missiles that had catalyzed the situation. But the escalation leading to the Crisis should be blamed on Kennedy's hubris, not Soviet aggression.
The comparison to Kennedy only rang true once Obama's campaign reached Ohio, where he stepped away from his usual vague policy assertions to attack the North American Free Trade Agreement. Despite Obama's obvious intellect, he decided to defy centuries of economic thought going back to David Ricardo, who showed that free trade brings long-term benefits to all participants. If American manufacturing jobs leave, it is only because we ought to be producing something better. Repealing NAFTA would hurt everyone - most notably by drastically increasing gas prices as tariffs increase on oil imports from Canada.
Obama has shown that, like Kennedy, he can inspire with lofty words and ideals. Also like Kennedy, he can steadfastly stick to popular platforms even when they are wrong. He has not, however, proved why on earth these are good reasons to vote for him. Kennedy inspired his way into an ideologically flawed presidency, and Obama is following in his footsteps yet again.
Monday, May 19, 2008
Trying it out
Let me first make it clear how much of a fan I am of this endeavor - I enjoyed the last blog a lot, and I was sad when it fell into disuse. That being said, I don't really like this color scheme - green text over a black background makes my eyes twitch.
I don't have any time for a lengthy tirade right now, since I'm still in the midst of school, unlike most of you out it cyberspace. In addition, I've already used some of my most controversial opinions for my school's newspaper this quarter. Perhaps I will convert some of those into blog posts to save time.
At any rate, it's good to be back, and I hope people stick around this time.
I don't have any time for a lengthy tirade right now, since I'm still in the midst of school, unlike most of you out it cyberspace. In addition, I've already used some of my most controversial opinions for my school's newspaper this quarter. Perhaps I will convert some of those into blog posts to save time.
At any rate, it's good to be back, and I hope people stick around this time.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Throw In The Towel
I don't care if she won West Virginia by a huge margin. I don't care if she thinks that she's still in this race. I don't care if she thinks that she can somehow convince the superdelegates to go back to supporting her. Hillary Clinton needs to accept that it is over for her. She campaigned hard and made this a really close race for a long, long time. Too long in fact, and part of me respects her for that. But the math just isn't there for her. There is no honest, respectful way for her to pull out a win at this point. Unless they somehow link Obama to 9/11, those superdelegates are going to stay right where they are.
I know I'm an Obama supporter and that this makes me very much biased, but this is my opinion and I'm sticking to it. All she's doing is hurting the party now. Obama isn't perfect by any means, and everything she does from here on out just helps to point out his flaws. She needs to accept that she isn't going to win and do whats best for the party. I'm not going to claim to be a political expert either. I've never cared about politics or elections before now, so this is all very new to me. But it is rather obvious to me that Hillary Clinton is being selfish and delusional. Throw in the towel. I'll like you a little bit more if you do. Besides, there is a good chance you are going to get the nod as Vice President.
I know I'm an Obama supporter and that this makes me very much biased, but this is my opinion and I'm sticking to it. All she's doing is hurting the party now. Obama isn't perfect by any means, and everything she does from here on out just helps to point out his flaws. She needs to accept that she isn't going to win and do whats best for the party. I'm not going to claim to be a political expert either. I've never cared about politics or elections before now, so this is all very new to me. But it is rather obvious to me that Hillary Clinton is being selfish and delusional. Throw in the towel. I'll like you a little bit more if you do. Besides, there is a good chance you are going to get the nod as Vice President.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
I'm Bringing Blogging Back
Where shall we begin? It has been a couple of years since I last decided to do anything with a blog. I've done little blog posts on my myspace page, but I don't feel like that really counts. And then a couple of months ago I started tossing around the idea of starting up another blog for all of our friends to converse on. People really seemed to enjoy the last one, so perhaps the sequel will have just as much success, if not more.
But I have the feeling that we are very different people than we were a few years ago. So this blog will likely have a completely different feel to it. And thats okay. I would just like to see a bunch of our friends talking on here regularly again. Facebook and Myspace can never really replace the kind of interactions that we had on the last blog. Conversations are very one-way, and group discussion is nearly impossible on Facebook and Myspace. So lets give this thing another shot, shall we?
The thing that pushed me over the edge and inspired me to start up another blog was a conversation I had with Garrett earlier tonight. We started talking about how much we've changed as people. High School Derrick would never believe his eyes if he saw who I am now. Sure there are a lot of qualities we have now that we had a few years ago, but we've also changed quite a bit too. We've all been out on our own paths exploring new territory, and so it should be expected that our experiences will shape us into new people.
But at the end of the day, all of us are essentially cut from the same cloth. We came from a small town and a lot of us share similar interests. Not all of us, but some. The important thing to understand in realizing how great our friend group really is, is how vast the network is. There are certain people in friend group that you are closer to than others. But thats okay. We all seem to get along with each other fairly well. If you are reading this and don't understand what "Friend Group" means, I'm not quite sure how to explain it to you. We have a lot of people that we hang out with and interact with. Where else could Bradley Bergstrand and Gavin Halpin be buddies? There is a pretty big age difference, yet they are still friends. Simply put, we have a very huge network of friends.
I feel bad sometimes because I'm unable to keep in contact with all of my friends. That doesn't mean that you are less important, it just means that I'm a busy guy. We are spread out now, and keeping in touch isn't as easy as it once was. I'm sure all of us are pretty busy from time to time. We are moving towards our careers or futures, and it can be easy to forget to call someone you haven't spoken to in a long while. But I'm hoping that this blog will be a good way to sort of connect us again. We need to have some discussions again, so lets get to it!
But I have the feeling that we are very different people than we were a few years ago. So this blog will likely have a completely different feel to it. And thats okay. I would just like to see a bunch of our friends talking on here regularly again. Facebook and Myspace can never really replace the kind of interactions that we had on the last blog. Conversations are very one-way, and group discussion is nearly impossible on Facebook and Myspace. So lets give this thing another shot, shall we?
The thing that pushed me over the edge and inspired me to start up another blog was a conversation I had with Garrett earlier tonight. We started talking about how much we've changed as people. High School Derrick would never believe his eyes if he saw who I am now. Sure there are a lot of qualities we have now that we had a few years ago, but we've also changed quite a bit too. We've all been out on our own paths exploring new territory, and so it should be expected that our experiences will shape us into new people.
But at the end of the day, all of us are essentially cut from the same cloth. We came from a small town and a lot of us share similar interests. Not all of us, but some. The important thing to understand in realizing how great our friend group really is, is how vast the network is. There are certain people in friend group that you are closer to than others. But thats okay. We all seem to get along with each other fairly well. If you are reading this and don't understand what "Friend Group" means, I'm not quite sure how to explain it to you. We have a lot of people that we hang out with and interact with. Where else could Bradley Bergstrand and Gavin Halpin be buddies? There is a pretty big age difference, yet they are still friends. Simply put, we have a very huge network of friends.
I feel bad sometimes because I'm unable to keep in contact with all of my friends. That doesn't mean that you are less important, it just means that I'm a busy guy. We are spread out now, and keeping in touch isn't as easy as it once was. I'm sure all of us are pretty busy from time to time. We are moving towards our careers or futures, and it can be easy to forget to call someone you haven't spoken to in a long while. But I'm hoping that this blog will be a good way to sort of connect us again. We need to have some discussions again, so lets get to it!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)